From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Apr 20 10:50:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from odin.acuson.com (odin.acuson.com [157.226.230.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FF837B440 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:50:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djohnson@acuson.com) Received: from acuson.com ([157.226.47.12]) by odin.acuson.com (Netscape Messaging Server 3.54) with ESMTP id AAA1263; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:55:58 -0700 Message-ID: <3AE076E5.A0BAA309@acuson.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:50:29 -0700 From: David Johnson Organization: Acuson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Timoteo Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top uptime! References: <3AE07137.5B2EB5CB@acuson.com> <0104201825111T.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Pedro Timoteo wrote: > I don't want to be TOO annoying, but could it be because the linux kernel 2.4 > is about 4 months old, and since then most people have upgraded to it, > ruining their uptimes? I seriously doubt that many people have upgrades to linux 2.4, particularly those with servers. If 2.2 (or 2.0) is meeting your needs, why upgrade to an untested kernel? Really now, how many operational webservers need the new features offered in 2.4? David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message