From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 15:06:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F361B16A4CE; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B211043D1D; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:06:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from volatile.chemikals.org (cae88-51-165.sc.rr.com [24.88.51.165]) i18N6kq3024837; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:06:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from volatile.chemikals.org (morganw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i18N6ker026414; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:06:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from localhost (morganw@localhost)i18N6kt3026411; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:06:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) X-Authentication-Warning: volatile.chemikals.org: morganw owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:06:45 -0500 (EST) From: Wesley Morgan To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1076279346.16832.33.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Message-ID: <20040208180346.B24023@volatile.chemikals.org> References: <200402081937.i18JbC9X045079@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040208172313.V24023@volatile.chemikals.org> <1076279346.16832.33.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Firebird linked against libc_r and libpthread? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:06:56 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > I just rebuild firebird on a recent -current, and it seems this port is > > > suffering from the pthread changes, because it is linked to both libc_r > > > and libpthread. It seems to run though, but not as stable as 0.6 was > > > doing. > > > > I'm having some trouble with libtool wanting to use libc_r with several > > ports, such as like g-wrap. > > Please be more specific. What are the messages? There don't seem to be any specific messages, but the "libgw-gtk.lai" file generated by libtool always has libc_r as a dependency. If I completely remove libc_r, it still tries to link with it. No manual editing seems to fix it, so it is pretty clear (from what I know, anyway) that libtool itself is making the decision. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!