From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 27 15:42:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C12837B99A for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:42:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA44725; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:42:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:42:22 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200003272342.PAA44725@apollo.backplane.com> To: Dennis Cc: Warner Losh , Andy , dg@root.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Onboard Intel NIC References: <200003272039.PAA18818@etinc.com> <200003271926.OAA18569@etinc.com> <200003272316.SAA19315@etinc.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :My "attitude" is irrelevant. I got called "lazy and incompetent" last week :for simply asking if it had been fixed. The guy who asked the same question :today didnt get flamed. So its not what is said, its who says it. Attitude is significant, since you are dealing with people who are under no obligation to respond, and generalizing one bozos response and applying it to the entire group isn't going to help. Frankly speaking, you will get the same sort of response from linux-kernel as you got from the this one if you were to approach a linux bug in the same way. I'd tell you to go over there and try it but linux-kernel is still recovering from the utterly stupid memory overcommit thread and don't deserve a second flame war this soon. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message