From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 12:29:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7815916A4CE; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FF543D46; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:29:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i46JTRb0007102; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:29:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i46JTRgi007101; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:29:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 12:29:27 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200405061929.i46JTRgi007101@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <409A8EF3.5825EF0C@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default behaviour of IP Options processing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:29:28 -0000 >Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 21:16:03 +0200 >From: Andre Oppermann >To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org >Subject: Default behaviour of IP Options processing >Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org >However I want to propose to change the default from processing options >to ignoring options (or even stronger to reject them). >.... >Opinions? Discussion? Yes/Nay? >From "ipfw show" on my home gateway/NAT/packet fileter box: ... 02000 0 0 deny log ip from any to any ipopt rr 02010 0 0 deny log ip from any to any ipopt ts 02020 0 0 deny log ip from any to any ipopt ssrr 02030 0 0 deny log ip from any to any ipopt lsrr I implemented those rules back around August, 1999, when I first set the box up; I don't recall that they have ever been triggered. (Uptime on the box is nowhere near 4+ years, as it's been tracking -STABLE about every couple of weeks: janus# uname -a FreeBSD janus.catwhisker.org 4.10-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE #66: Sun May 2 06:05:10 PDT 2004 root@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/JANUS i386 janus# So the counters from "show ipfw" only show traffic since janus# uptime 12:27PM up 4 days, 5:53, 1 user, load averages: 0.04, 0.03, 0.06 janus# -- not really enough to be significant.) My point was that there are some of us who, quite deliberately, decline to accept options-laden traffic anyhow. So I have no known reason to object to the proposal. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org I do not "unsubscribe" from email "services" to which I have not explicitly subscribed. Rather, I block spammers' access to SMTP servers I control, and encourage others who are in a position to do so to do likewise.