From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 30 6:34:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from light.imasy.or.jp (light.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AA537B401 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by light.imasy.or.jp (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6/light) with UUCP id f7UDXow16695; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:33:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from peace.mahoroba.org (IDENT:Gy+Vl8TyuiSBI79iJsTQpM/ppl4pr00B5rgI8OUMFO0DmiL3hCr7R/Oey86IPFi4@peace.mahoroba.org [3ffe:505:2:0:200:f8ff:fe05:3eae]) (authenticated as ume with CRAM-MD5) by mail.mahoroba.org (8.11.6/8.11.6/chaos) with ESMTP/inet6 id f7UDXRj05629; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:33:28 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:34:12 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20010830.223412.21853525.ume@mahoroba.org> To: wvhemel@vub.ac.be Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ume@mahoroba.org Subject: Re: ipv6 route configuration From: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: References: <20010830.055029.48456313.ume@mahoroba.org> X-Mailer: xcite1.38> Mew version 1.95b119 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?= X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.imasy.org/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 0C 53 FC 5D D0 37 91 05 D0 B3 EF 36 9B 6A BC X-URL: http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:35:30 +0200 (CEST) >>>>> Wouter Van Hemel said: wvhemel> So, now step by step, for the router, you would do this (ed0 is outside, wvhemel> ed1 internal): wvhemel> route add -inet6 3ffe:b80:1c8:: -prefixlen 48 -interface lo0 wvhemel> (to stop looping, right?) Yes. wvhemel> ifconfig ed1 inet6 3ffe:b80:1c8::1 prefixlen 64 wvhemel> (route to internal interface) wvhemel> -- that's enough for the router? (no rtadv, just static route's) It seems you need to have default route for internet, too. wvhemel> However, this: wvhemel> route add -inet6 default link-local-address-of-router%interface-of-the-host wvhemel> gives an error, 'No address associated with hostname: bad value'. Please replace link-local-address-of-router and interface-of-the-host to your actuall address. wvhemel> So it's good measure to make /64 subnets... That's the kind of thing I'd wvhemel> like to learn a bit more, about the reasons and thetechnical side. Do you wvhemel> have any pointers? Please refer RFC2373 (IPv6 Addressing Architecture) 2.5.7 Aggregatable Global Unicast Addresses. -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message