From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 15:40:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C51065675 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAF98FC15 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (m206-63.dsl.tsoft.com [198.144.206.63]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0LFeVi0059371; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:40:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <4D39A8FA.8060406@feral.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:40:42 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <4D38CAEE.2060705@feral.com> <4D38D49A.2010909@feral.com> <20110121162202.S2816@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20110121162202.S2816@besplex.bde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Default is to whitelist mail, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:40:32 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing -frename-registers from sys/conf.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:40:33 -0000 On 1/20/2011 10:15 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Matthew Jacob wrote: > >> Never mind this ill thought out request. >> >> On 1/20/2011 3:53 PM, Matthew Jacob wrote: >>> It helps substantially in trying to debug amd64 kernels to remove >>> this flag. >>> >>> Has anyone heard of a good reason we need to keep this? Whom else >>> should I ask? > > What's ill-thought out about it? What was ill thought out about it was that somebody at Panasas had reported that removing just this option made kernel crash dumps way easier to follow. But it turns out that they had also removed all optimizations as well (and hadn't told me). That made this a non-starter.