From owner-freebsd-net Wed Oct 24 8:55:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.intergate.ca (hermes.intergate.ca [207.34.179.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 460B337B401 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 35923 invoked by uid 1007); 24 Oct 2001 16:31:32 -0000 Received: from landons@uniserve.com by hermes.intergate.ca with qmail-scanner-0.93 (uvscan: v4.0.50/v4166. . Clean. Processed in 0.934436 secs); 24/10/2001 09:31:31 Received: from landons.vpp-office.uniserve.ca (HELO pirahna.uniserve.com) (216.113.198.10) by hermes.intergate.ca with SMTP; 24 Oct 2001 16:31:30 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011024084343.031b7770@pop.uniserve.com> X-Sender: landons@pop.uniserve.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:54:41 -0700 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: Landon Stewart Subject: ADSL with two interfaces in one machine using "dhclient" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I can obtain two seperate IP addresses and everything routes OK for both interfaces. Its just these ARP messages that are annoying me (filling up my logs with repeated messages). I'm having a problem with ARP's from my gateway. Both interfaces use the same gateway, but I get an error message in the log stating that: (GW = Gateway, IP1 = IP of first interface etc...) /kernel: arp: is on xl0 but got reply from on ed0 last message repeated 35 times last message repeated 136 times last message repeated 149 times last message repeated 112 times /kernel: arp: is on ed0 but got reply from on xl0 last message repeated 94 times last message repeated 111 times etc. etc... Failing this how can I stop the kernel from even logging this? (what to turn off?) I also get errors saying that my interface MAC addresses have changed (this is due to one interface thinking that the other interfaces MAC address is the MAC of my DSL router, and then it finds the REAL MAC address for the other interface and so forth). I have set a metric (scopeid) to one on my primary interface and to two on my secondary interface. External connections. A switch rather than a hub could fix this problem and I'll probably buy one anyway, but I'd like to know how to stop this. Can I have two interfaces with the same gateway without getting MAC address notices? --- Landon Stewart landons@uniserve.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message