Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:30:54 -0700 From: Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org> To: Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libutil in Debian Message-ID: <CAHSQbTC_nkY9__VEo1eJt461SMYE6qmWQV5RPNuCb0aaucZwJw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOfDtXMgX1VT38yhjPOJvVo60fzpdNfa1tYCBpt2gBRp8LbzVg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOfDtXN2fWQAyGNb_ifH9y=zHO%2BGGnSdWnD8C6BzWDTU_7rWFQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130709113553.GP67810@FreeBSD.org> <CAOfDtXOTqzF9=s%2BUv6%2BMoAu0nrmyGrxJz4xaSJYEfDzRvrKx8g@mail.gmail.com> <20130709165939.GP91021@kib.kiev.ua> <0657575A-BF3A-486F-9582-C01E0FD97E38@bsdimp.com> <51DC4712.20707@coosemans.org> <CAGE5yCpD7WxW6vFtUggYQ%2BBayi1p7fxzq41%2Ba6RCJagqPHV=Fw@mail.gmail.com> <6E057FD0-9054-44CD-A806-3AFD8A7196CC@bsdimp.com> <CAGE5yCqAFqOEs_93KgojsgkOO%2B3LVTrhX6%2BRg_BS9OLMxbcfMA@mail.gmail.com> <D99F95A3-81D2-47D5-8D4F-D3CCBEB251EE@bsdimp.com> <CAGE5yCratkaVjAsyJZz=zPKxAWpCnFyjjULWeUU_MSxN-_yTJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfDtXNWva%2BKY6G_%2Ba0e158AA%2BNVrSvcvJ3=bzx%2B1cRsB=t=DQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHSQbTBNR3TwHifDN1p5t=tHwvNRYSY-KgVxPeM=FENE2mZwwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfDtXMgX1VT38yhjPOJvVo60fzpdNfa1tYCBpt2gBRp8LbzVg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> wrote: > 2013/7/9 Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org>: > > What about importing the necessary functions into the glibc libutil for > > Debian? This way it stays as libutil, and if glibc imports the > functions to > > itself there's less to worry about. If glibc's libutil started out life > as > > libbsdcompat, then I think it would be appropriate to merge as needed. > > Even assuming they'd agree, which is unlikely, FSF would require > copyright assignment paperwork, to be signed and physically mailed by > each contributor. This would apply to future updates as well. > > The paper itself is no big deal (author retains the right to license > the software under any terms they wish), but hunting down contributors > to persuade them to sign the papers is definitely not what I had in > mind when I started this thread ;-) > > -- > Robert Millan > I was thinking more in terms of adding the functions to the debian local patch set. I don't know how intrusive it would be, but it may be worth looking into. - Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHSQbTC_nkY9__VEo1eJt461SMYE6qmWQV5RPNuCb0aaucZwJw>