From owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 23 13:11:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CDF16A4CE
	for <database@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:11:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
	[213.184.65.80])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1680E43D45
	for <database@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:11:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])iBNDBWV5047854;
	Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:11:33 +0700 (KRAT)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Message-ID: <41CAC3B4.F3378A56@kuzbass.ru>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:10:12 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
Organization: SVZServ
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: database@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <gwk@rahn-koltermann.de>
Subject: Re: Oracle 10 anyone?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-database@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Database use and development under FreeBSD
	<freebsd-database.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-database>,
	<mailto:freebsd-database-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-database>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-database@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-database-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-database>,
	<mailto:freebsd-database-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:11:39 -0000

> I was trying to bring up Oracle10 on FreeBSD 5.2.1, but I get TNS:lost
> contact again when I "connect / as sysdba".
> 
> Ktrace tells me that one of the last things that oracle does before
> exit(1), is trying to open /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax.  That is apparently
> not implemented by linprocfs.
> 
> Did anyone get farther than this?

Hi!

I've just upgraded working Oracle9i (9.2.0.1.0) upto 9.2.0.6.0
It does nearly the same thing. Did you manage to solve the problem
that time?

Eugene Grosbein