From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 04:55:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEF51065675; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vx.sk (mail.vx.sk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:100:1043::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB948FC15; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 04:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from core.vx.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AA712A8EA; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 05:55:09 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.vx.sk Received: from mail.vx.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by core.vx.sk (mail.vx.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id R80I7BWZweQa; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 05:55:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.9.8.1] (188-167-78-139.dynamic.chello.sk [188.167.78.139]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D97C12A8DC; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 05:55:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD4DFAB.3030500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 05:55:07 +0100 From: Martin Matuska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sk; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <201008211141.o7LBfWdv067923@svn.freebsd.org> <20100828172744.GJ2077@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20100828172744.GJ2077@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Rui Paulo Subject: Re: svn commit: r211553 - head/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:55:10 -0000 I agree with Pawel, we should use "FreeBSD". Is this (+ the dtrace test) going to be changed + set for MFC? Dňa 28.08.2010 19:27, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote / napísal(a): > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:41:32AM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Author: rpaulo >> Date: Sat Aug 21 11:41:32 2010 >> New Revision: 211553 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211553 >> >> Log: >> Add sysname to struct opensolaris_utsname. This is needed by one DTrace >> test. >> >> Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation >> >> Modified: >> head/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_misc.c >> >> Modified: head/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_misc.c >> ============================================================================== >> --- head/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_misc.c Sat Aug 21 11:33:49 2010 (r211552) >> +++ head/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_misc.c Sat Aug 21 11:41:32 2010 (r211553) >> @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); >> char hw_serial[11] = "0"; >> >> struct opensolaris_utsname utsname = { >> - .nodename = "unset" >> + .nodename = "unset", >> + .sysname = "SunOS" > > This collides with the changes I have in perforce. Could you take a look at: > > //depot/user/pjd/zfs/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_misc.c > //depot/user/pjd/zfs/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/misc.h > > I'd prefer sysname to say FreeBSD on FreeBSD, rather than SunOS. > I see it is being used in one DTrace test. Changing 'tst.str.d.out' to > expect "FreeBSD" instead of "SunOS" is ok? >