From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 19:48:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FFD1065674; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A03D8FC0A; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DFC5C1CD73; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:48:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:48:17 +0100 From: Ed Schouten To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20100303194817.GK8200@hoeg.nl> References: <201003031849.o23InFJU034484@svn.freebsd.org> <20100303190551.GJ8200@hoeg.nl> <201003031413.20685.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9RHkgBN4Ly9iZsmR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201003031413.20685.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff , src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204650 - head/share/man/man9 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:48:18 -0000 --9RHkgBN4Ly9iZsmR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * John Baldwin wrote: > > Maybe I'm flogging a dead horse, but this is 2010. Whether or not a > > compiler supports C99 is no longer an issue. We're already far beyond > > the point of going back to C89. >=20 > The point is that if you look at almost all of the new-bus drivers in the= =20 > tree, they do not use C99 initializers to initialize their KOBJ class. > Given that, I do not see a reason to make driver(9) document a style that > almost no drivers use. If we did want to do something different, we > should use the DEFINE_CLASS_0() macro that can be used to declare a KOBJ > class. That sounds like a good argument. Thanks for explaining! --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --9RHkgBN4Ly9iZsmR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuOvQEACgkQ52SDGA2eCwVKigCeNHLcm18kzFrxtjU9lpsZrEII kdUAnj7nTh+1KI4NGXC11CymHCOSqzl3 =STNf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9RHkgBN4Ly9iZsmR--