Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 17:52:26 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: nash@mcs.com Cc: nate@sri.MT.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW (was Re: miscfs/devfs) Message-ID: <199606062352.RAA27728@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199606062352.SAA04206@zen.nash.org> References: <199606062352.SAA04206@zen.nash.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I believe IPFW is synchronized between -stable and -current (minus > some compiler warning cleanup by Gary). Great. I wasn't sure. > The documentation on the > other hand, is either not complete (the ipfw man page), or somewhat > invalid (the handbook -- Gary's writeup is excellent, but the syntax > has changed and new features have been added). > > If there's anyone to blame for this, it would be me. I've agreed to > take the ipfw torch from Poul, but I've only just recently gotten > commit privileges. I'm glad you've taken the torch. I was worried that things weren't going to be documented, and given that -stable is going to be 2.1.5R soon, I am glad the documentation will be updated. Thanks for doing this! Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606062352.RAA27728>