From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 2 13:41:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA10109 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 13:41:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net [206.64.4.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA10102 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 13:41:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA16740; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 16:43:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 16:43:58 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net To: Terry Lambert cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: scanf in the kernel? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > bcopy doesn't support overlapping ranges on all systems. > > eg. IRIX 6.2 man page: > > NOTE > The use of overlapping buffers with bcopy is not guaranteed to work. Use > the memmove(3C) function if the buffers might overlap. > > Since BSD was the first "implementation" of b{copy|zero} stuff i think our implementation is correct no? Considering IRIX didn't have snprintf in thier c library in their 1997 release says something doesn't it? :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message