Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 23:37:05 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category Message-ID: <b269bc570905162337v6d2fee16o75a68d5eb7ba7b59@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <28283d910905161638w5f7e5f54gcd16ef29f0f0b0b6@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905161134510.50084@FGD135.localdomain> <4A0F35C7.7060703@p6m7g8.com> <28283d910905161638w5f7e5f54gcd16ef29f0f0b0b6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com= >wrote: > >> Josh Rickmar wrote: >> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc. >> > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both do >> > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-licensed >> > replacement for screen.) >> > >> Does anyone have any thoughts on tmux vs screen ? =C2=A0the NO_PACKAGE i= n >> screen has been annoying me for years now if I can find a good >> replacement I'm so there. >> > tmux does not work inside the shell due to sc. But in =C2=A0X it works wo= nders. tmux works just fine at a console without X running. --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b269bc570905162337v6d2fee16o75a68d5eb7ba7b59>