From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Oct  1  4: 3:24 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FD114D6F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Oct 1999 04:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.037 #1)
	id 11X0QX-000A8G-00; Fri, 01 Oct 1999 13:00:37 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Doug <doemill@shocking.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: `hip` hosts.allow rule injector thing. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:35:19 MST."
             <Pine.BSI.4.05.9909301829580.24777-100000@fingers.shocking.com> 
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 13:00:37 +0200
Message-ID: <38951.938775637@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:35:19 MST, Doug wrote:

> erg, and now that I think of it, I dont think it will work with the new
> hosts_access, but with the old /etc/hosts.allow and hosts.deny it will,
> which I use on my openbsd box

What does that mean? What's the difference between the new and old
hosts_access? Are you talking about the new blacklist feature?

Ciao,
sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message