From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 21 20:30:21 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFA116A482;
	Sun, 21 May 2006 20:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D69243D45;
	Sun, 21 May 2006 20:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29])
	by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465;
	Sun, 21 May 2006 13:30:15 -0700
Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 10DC945046;
	Sun, 21 May 2006 13:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 May 2006 20:43:52 +0900."
	<ygezmhbiow7.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> 
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 13:30:15 -0700
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Message-Id: <20060521203015.10DC945046@ptavv.es.net>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: resolver's ABI backward compatibility was lost 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:30:22 -0000

> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:43:52 +0900
> From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>
> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've just committed following things:
> 
> 1) Upgrade res_update(3) and the friends to BIND9's one excluding TSIG
>    support.

Why is the TSIG support excluded? It's something I have wanted a great
deal and which may become mandatory for US governments systems in the
future. 

is there a problem with including it or some other issue?
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634