From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 8 20:31:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8500137B844 for ; Mon, 8 May 2000 20:31:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@holly.calldei.com) Received: from holly.calldei.com ([208.191.155.7]) by mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0FU900A6QWDA70@mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net> for hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 May 2000 22:29:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.calldei.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA17050; Mon, 08 May 2000 22:29:53 -0500 (CDT envelope-from chris) Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 22:29:52 -0500 From: Chris Costello Subject: Re: What do people think of maybe using the sourceforge software? In-reply-to: <14620.957842046@localhost> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chris@calldei.com Message-id: <20000508222952.A16808@holly.calldei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.4i References: <14620.957842046@localhost> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday, May 08, 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > I think it's also reasonable to say that FreeBSD itself is a bit too > large to register and run as a sourceforge project, but why not use > the same software to offer a higher level of "polish" to the existing > project infrastructure? Comments? I'm just playing with this stuff a > bit myself right now and will say more once I actually know more about > it. It's my opinion that there's no need for more "polish." Currently what we have, CVS and the CVSWeb HTTP front-end, seem perfectly adequate to me. -- |Chris Costello |State-of-the-art: What we could do with enough money. `----------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message