From owner-freebsd-security Tue Feb 13 6:28:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from cache.bi.itb.ac.id (www.bi.itb.ac.id [167.205.24.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C089937B4EC for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 06:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by cache.bi.itb.ac.id (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B35B73E06; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:23:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cache.bi.itb.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB51BA01; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:23:13 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:23:13 +0000 (GMT) From: dodi maryanto X-Sender: dodi@cache.bi.itb.ac.id To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Attila Nagy , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Secure Servers (SMTP, POP3, FTP) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Can you show that inetd is significantly larger and/or slower than > tcp-server? As for ease of configuration, the format of inetd.conf is > straightforward and well documented. > if you have many rule to set, cdb format is very fast to read. ( cdb is a standard db file for djb-ware ). yes, it is also easy to configure even with poor documentation. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message