From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  1 18:32:04 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B158AEDF;
 Mon,  1 Apr 2013 18:32:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
 [188.252.31.196])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DF6883;
 Mon,  1 Apr 2013 18:32:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r31IVptQ098329;
 Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r31IVpjM098326;
 Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture
In-Reply-To: <944760435.20130401210118@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304012031370.98303@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOgwaMt2Qvt8c4YvRLJ23sqpODvb00XgwY7Czr+JVALXmK1wLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304011802360.97433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <944760435.20130401210118@serebryakov.spb.ru>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:32:04 -0000

> WP> still 64-bit - CPU.
> It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
> firmwares are 64-bit CPU.


don't know of any now in shops that are not

>
> -- 
> // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>