From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 25 16:00:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA25753 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 16:00:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.camalott.com (mail.camalott.com [208.203.140.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA25590 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 15:59:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-150.camalott.com [208.229.74.150]) by mail.camalott.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16666; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 18:00:24 -0500 Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA01698; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 17:58:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from joelh) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 17:58:25 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199808252258.RAA01698@detlev.UUCP> To: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl CC: dakott@alpha.delta.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199808252104.XAA01621@yedi.iaf.nl> (message from Wilko Bulte on Tue, 25 Aug 1998 23:04:40 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: Adaptec 1542i Performance on -stable [was Re: SCSI Controller] From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.org References: <199808252104.XAA01621@yedi.iaf.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> Many 1542s (particularly the B series) were very sensitive to poor >> cabling and termination problems. > I think there were also cabling sensitivities in the C series(?). Shoot, I don't know offhand. I've had no problems with my 1542C on various cabling configurations (except when I put a connector on backwards), with no RFI shielding in place. Best, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message