From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 11 12:47:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B5537B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:47:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f1BKl7g03542; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:47:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:47:07 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Kris Kennaway Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSL ASM patch Message-ID: <20010211124707.S3274@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010211094946.A51308@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211122802.A78975@mollari.cthul.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010211122802.A78975@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:28:02PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Kris Kennaway [010211 12:32] wrote: > Updated patch now available at the same location. Changes: > > * Document the MACHINE_CPU types which are currently used > > * Make NOPERL mutually exclusive with OpenSSL ASM and document it > > * Teach make(1) about MACHINE_CPU and provide sensible defaults for > i386 and alpha. > > http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/openssl-asm.patch > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain an order of magnitude more SSL connections than FreeBSD, since you say this gives us a 3-5x speed up, I'd really like to see it committed and ported to -stable ASAP. Is it possible to have multiple ASM cores and use the appropriate routines? Or must it all be choosen at compile time? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message