From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 15 9:10:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu (web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu [134.129.125.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F8937B406 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f9FGAg433017; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:10:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tinguely) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:10:42 -0500 (CDT) From: mark tinguely Message-Id: <200110151610.f9FGAg433017@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> To: dillon@earth.backplane.com, tmoestl@gmx.net Subject: Re: contigfree, free what? Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Patrick.Cipiere@udcast.com, tinguely@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu In-Reply-To: <20011012204730.F407@crow.dom2ip.de> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a potentially silly question about contigmalloc1(), if the very unlikely occurance that the kernel VM space ran out, (the vm_map_findspace() failed) wouldn't we want to return the chunk of contiguous physical space back on the free queue before we return an allocation failure? --mark tinguely. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message