Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 14:27:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Melvyn Sopacua <melvyn@magemana.nl> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Melvyn Sopacua <melvyn@magemana.nl> Subject: Re: How to tell pkg it's OK to overwrite files by another port Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1408091414230.27232@fire.magemana.nl> In-Reply-To: <20140806210759.GQ17537@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1408050528170.52235@fire.magemana.nl> <20140805143415.GD17537@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1408062112220.72407@fire.magemana.nl> <20140806210759.GQ17537@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Baptiste, On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 09:19:48PM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: >> Both are candidates for myconfig.conf, where optimized should win and >> otherwise default, but they come from two different ports. This may >> actually be the way to handle it, if @sample didn't assume the same >> basename. > There is the @sample keyword for that ;) I don't think there is. @sample foo.sample sets target_file to foo. There's no way to specify that target_file should be bar. If two ports have the same .sample file, there is still a conflict. So in my case, I need two different .sample files installing to a shared target_file. I think this is a corner case, so I'll stick it in a custom pkg-install. -- Melvyn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1408091414230.27232>