From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jul 5 19:45:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81199B21C9C for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A75C1854 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ip70-178-28-115.ks.ks.cox.net [70.178.28.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1978243BC2; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:45:46 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Remove options from poudriere option files for ports which were removed in the port To: Matthias Fechner , Kevin Oberman References: <08125827-377e-ae2b-6075-552fe9dae3b0@fechner.net> <8884fe0b-92a0-aed7-d5e3-af5bdd5e9229@marino.st> Cc: Kimmo Paasiala , FreeBSD Mailing List From: John Marino Message-ID: <80ffeff0-9f0c-211a-46f1-6dac41053483@marino.st> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:45:45 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8884fe0b-92a0-aed7-d5e3-af5bdd5e9229@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160705-1, 07/05/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:45:49 -0000 On 7/5/2016 11:26, John Marino wrote: > On 7/5/2016 10:36, Matthias Fechner wrote: >> Am 04.07.2016 um 22:03 schrieb John Marino: >>> sorry, the correct invocation is "synth status-everything". There is >>> a man page (man 1 synth) as well. >> >> thanks for this tip. >> >> As I have to check my poudriere build environment (I do not build my >> packages locally) I tried the following: >> poudriere testport -j 103amd64 -i -o ports-mgmt/synth >> >> This will compile the port, install it in a jail and will give me an >> interactive console in this jail. >> >> If I try to execute synth I get: >> mount: tmpfs: Operation not permitted >> >> raised REPLICANT.SCENARIO_UNEXPECTED : /sbin/mount -t tmpfs tmpfs >> /usr/obj/synth-live/SL09 => failed with code 1 >> >> I think running synth from a jail is not supported? >> > > It is supported. See the FAQ at: > https://github.com/jrmarino/synth#synth-fails-when-i-run-it-inside-a-jail--what-can-i-do > By the way, you don't need to run Synth inside a poudriere jail. Just configure synth to use the same jail as poudriere with "synth configure" command, and the same ports db too. I don't know what you are even trying to accomplish by running it inside poudriere. I thought you were trying to validate your the saved options on your poudriere ports, and you don't need poudriere for that. John --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus