Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:42:53 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com>, Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <op.wkhcpr0n34t2sn@me-pc> In-Reply-To: <504F4650.9090700@protected-networks.net> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911122122.GJ37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911123833.GA54483@freebsd.org> <848C813E-E6EC-4FAF-9374-B5583A077404@cederstrand.dk> <20120911133215.GB87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAMVU60ZVmCaYr=MyLsnz9tqD9O5m9Y8bgYiqtqvUXcYcXj-RmQ@mail.gmail.com> <504F4650.9090700@protected-networks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:10:24 -0500, Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> wrote: > - From the link (http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp) > that Steve Kargl referenced (dated July 2012). I don't know where this guy is getting his info, but CLANG is /more/ standards compliant and doesn't have an issue producing "correct" code. Though it might not be the fastest (yet). And if Apple (probably one of the largest commercial CLANG users) doesn't have an issue with it producing "incorrect" code why should we believe this guy?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wkhcpr0n34t2sn>