From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Fri Dec 15 17:21:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4850EE86E53 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlmuir@imca.aps.anl.gov) Received: from tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov (tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov [164.54.200.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DFB57DCD8 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlmuir@imca.aps.anl.gov) Received: by tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov (Postfix, from userid 502) id 00D392005D; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:11:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:11:35 -0600 From: "J. Lewis Muir" To: John Nemeth Cc: Eitan Adler , FreeBSD Hackers , Kernel@dragonflybsd.org, tech-misc@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file Message-ID: <20171215171135.GA17739@tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov> References: <201712150625.vBF6PDcl029968@server.cornerstoneservice.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201712150625.vBF6PDcl029968@server.cornerstoneservice.ca> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:52:52 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:21:31 -0000 On 12/14, John Nemeth wrote: > On Dec 14, 8:15pm, Eitan Adler wrote: > } I'd like to turn this into into a dot file > > How easy would it be to render something like the existing > bsd-family-tree, e.g. something that is reasonably intelligent when > viewed with more(1) or less(1) with the same basic information that > it has now? Also, would rendering it be something that can reasonably > be done while building the system, or would it need to be pre-rendered > and the result checked into the SCM (keep in mind that NetBSD's > build.sh is portable, i.e. you can build NetBSD on Windows if you > feel like it)? Maybe Graph-Easy could be used? I've never used it, but it claims to support generating graphs as ASCII art. Lewis