From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 9 16:09:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D48A16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smarthost.enta.net (smarthost.enta.net [195.74.97.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F2F43D1F for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jacs@gnome.co.uk) Received: from smartsmtp.enta.net (smtp.enta.net [195.74.97.230]) by smarthost.enta.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800881132 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:07:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp.enta.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smartsmtp.enta.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i69GOL31091814 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:24:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jacs@gnome.co.uk) Received: from hawk.gnome.co.uk (81-31-113-153.adsl.entanet.co.uk [81.31.113.153]) by smtp.enta.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 562339683F for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:24:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from kite (kite.gnome.co.uk [192.168.123.3]) by hawk.gnome.co.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i69G3gTl009875 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:03:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jacs@gnome.co.uk) Message-ID: <014701c465ce$4e6a8a90$037ba8c0@gnome.co.uk> From: "Chris Stenton" To: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:03:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: default HZ value in 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:09:20 -0000 Any reason why the default value for HZ is still set at 100? Would not 1000 be better for finer granularity?