From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jan 23 17:34:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA08489 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 17:34:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp7.portal.net.au [202.12.71.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA08453 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 17:34:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00356; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 11:54:06 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199801240124.LAA00356@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu cc: Darren Reed , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Free netscape - good or bad ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Jan 1998 13:16:37 CDT." <9801231816.AA10759@mlor.its.rpi.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 11:54:06 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I think it's a good move for Netscape. And to keep this somewhat > relevent to the hackers mailing list, it will be certainly a good > move for netscape on FreeBSD... :-) What *I'd* like to see/hear would be some commentary from the people inside Netscape that are responsible for the current port. Given any sort of say in the matter, I would be asking them to take a fairly active guiding role' as they are in an extremely important bridging position. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\