Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:44:16 -0500 From: Tom McLaughlin <tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heimdal vs MIT KerberosV Message-ID: <49A8A500.8070701@sdf.lonestar.org> In-Reply-To: <200902261323.37744.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <ade45ae90902260948s1a74ca80qbcfdbc5a1c4949e@mail.gmail.com> <200902261323.37744.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mel wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 08:48:35 Tim Judd wrote:
>
> Building WITHOUT_KERBEROS and installing MIT-port, is best option to use that
> implementation. You may need to remove libraries by hand, not sure if make
> delete-old-libs covers it.
Using WITHOUT_KERBEROS to build world IIRC will cause you to lose
pam_{krb5,ksu} and GSSAPI support in ssh. Depending on your
environment, those might be useful.
Other than the kadmin protocol differences why change from Heimdal to MIT?
tom
--
| tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org |
| FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49A8A500.8070701>