From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 29 9:44: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE1A37B424 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31879 invoked by uid 1001); 29 Sep 2000 16:43:53 +0000 (GMT) To: jim@siteplus.net Cc: jan@smartsoft.cc, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP. From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:14:23 -0400 (EDT)" References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:43:53 +0200 Message-ID: <31877.970245833@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Reverse lookups are like Highlanders. "There can be only one." No. You can certainly have a reverse lookup returning multiple names. Ie. the following is perfectly legal: $origin 3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. 4 PTR name1.example.com. 4 PTR name2.example.com. 4 PTR name3.example.com. However, this does *not* necessarily mean that such a configuration is good idea... Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message