Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:48:43 +0200 From: Kyrre =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nyg=E5rd?= <kyrreny@broadpark.no> To: "Matti J. Karki" <mjk@iki.fi> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Code beautifiers, anyone? Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060825224701.02400f20@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <1b15366e0608251127r7067e0c5wd5ba6dea29e1a011@mail.gmail.co m> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060824145822.0194fc10@broadpark.no> <1b15366e0608240618j62d41ad3j537f095b2e566ed5@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060824192439.02386de8@broadpark.no> <5.1.0.14.2.20060825064053.01eebec0@209.152.117.178> <1b15366e0608250531q6187d598h78b02e14ab4b5ac2@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060825160431.023a1650@broadpark.no> <1b15366e0608251127r7067e0c5wd5ba6dea29e1a011@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 20:27 25.08.2006, Matti J. Karki wrote: >A word of warning. Above, I mentioned that it's important to remember >that my example will remove _all_ tabulator characters from text. This >means that - for example - all lines with indentation inside the code >comments will be messed up (remember, usually a tab character equals 8 >spaces and I'm removing tabs all together). This leads me to my point: >my code does not handle multi-line comments at all. They may look >messed-up. A single curly bracket inside of a comment will throw the >indentation code out of sync. Also the code does not address line >breaks "\", so for example the macro definitions will not be indented >correctly. So, it will take some additional work to be able to run the >script without any side effects. Seems we gotta give this baby some sessions :) Have you seen this yet? http://www.arachnoid.com/ruby/rubyBeautifier.html All the best, Kyrre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7.0.1.0.2.20060825224701.02400f20>