From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 30 08:38:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C574FF; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: from uriah.heep.sax.de (uriah.heep.sax.de [IPv6:2a01:170:1047::9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413617B2; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by uriah.heep.sax.de (Postfix, from userid 107) id D98FEE; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:38:05 +0100 (MET) Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:38:05 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/174559: [patch] add vendor patchset to devel/avr-libc Message-ID: <20130330083805.GY37603@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <201303300358.r2U3wwfA027766@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201303300358.r2U3wwfA027766@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5E84 F980 C3CA FD4B B584 1070 F48C A81B 69A8 5873 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: r4721@tormail.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:38:08 -0000 As koobs@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] add vendor patchset to devel/avr-libc > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: joerg->freebsd-ports-bugs > Responsible-Changed-By: koobs > Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 30 03:58:57 UTC 2013 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > maintainer timeout, unassign by submitter request; if you're still > working on this just let me know > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174559 Please do *not* apply this patchset (I've already told the submitter). The way to go is not that Atmel creates their own fork of the opensource tools by establishing vendor patchsets, but rather that they submit their changes and additions back to the opensource avr-libc project. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)