From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 22 17:25:08 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA19702
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA19697
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.4/8.6.9) id TAA02998; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 19:24:54 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199704230024.TAA02998@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: Recent vfork kernel changes broke csh & tcsh!
In-Reply-To: <199704221828.LAA21302@kithrup.com> from Sean Eric Fagan at "Apr 22, 97 11:28:55 am"
To: sef@Kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 19:24:54 -0500 (EST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>
> Am I the only one who thinks that restoring behaviour known to be a defect
> in the original implementation is a BAD idea?
> 
I don't think that you are the only one.  However, it makes a difference
of about 3mins out of 1:51 for make world.

I am backing it out anyway.

John