From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 17:32:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F8116A4B3 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u173n10.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C635243FDD for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:32:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4C4C3519E; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:31:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B392434F2C; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:31:05 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:31:05 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Lewis Thompson In-Reply-To: <20031010002458.GG587@lewiz.org> Message-ID: <20031009212824.Q28590@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20030803200948.GA10712@lewiz.org> <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net> <20031009211629.T28590@ganymede.hub.org> <20031010002458.GG587@lewiz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD-questions cc: Kenny Freeman Subject: Re: Jail FS questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:32:20 -0000 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Lewis Thompson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:17:12PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Lewis Thompson wrote: > > > > > > Anyway, nullfs is great for "remounting" > > > > parts of the file system. > > > > > > Yeah, right now I'm using NFS mounts, which is a bit ugly, to say the > > > least. Since I had troubles with union I steered clear of nullfs, since > > > the same ``slippery dog'' warning exists ;) > > > > pluto# df -t union | wc -l > > 65 > > > > What kind of troubles? > > Just causing system reboots. Randomly. > > Also, for some reason it doesn't seem to propogate permissions, which > is annoying for using them as the bases for jails. system reboots: what version of OS? permissions: do you have a way I can "test this"? Note that I run ~150 jails right now across 4 servers, with unionfs used to shared applications across them all to save on disk space ... I haven't had a unionfs related panic of the server in quite awhile now (but I run -STABLE faithfully), and haven't experienced any 'permissions' problems that I know of, or that anyone has ever pointed out to me ...