From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 12:33:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A6F16A4CE; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F1743D41; Thu, 6 May 2004 12:33:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from DeepCore.dk (sos.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.130]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i46JXEUj063771; Thu, 6 May 2004 21:33:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <409A92FA.6080104@DeepCore.dk> Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 21:33:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040329) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Petri Helenius References: <409938F7.2090603@DeepCore.dk> <409A8675.3080102@he.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <409A8675.3080102@he.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: John Polstra Subject: Re: em(4) problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:33:24 -0000 Petri Helenius wrote: > I´m highly confident that this is a case of integrated "CSA" ethernet > with broken BIOS. I suspect you get an message about that when booting. Nope. no messages to that effect, oh and it works in windows(tm)... The last thing I see if I try to use em0 is: em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex and then the system locks up hard. > Søren Schmidt wrote: > >> John Polstra wrote: >> >>> On 05-May-2004 Søren Schmidt wrote: >>> >>>> For what its worth I have problems with one em based interface as >>>> well, it locks the machine solid when used: >>>> >>>> em0: port >>>> 0xb000-0xb01f mem 0xfb100000-0xfb11ffff irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci1 >>>> em0: Reserved 0x20000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfb100000 >>>> em0: Reserved 0x20 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0xb000 >>>> em0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>>> em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:80:9f:b6 >>>> >>>> where this one works just fine: >>>> >>>> em1: port >>>> 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xfa000000-0xfa01ffff irq 19 at device 10.0 on pci3 >>>> em1: Reserved 0x20000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfa000000 >>>> em1: Reserved 0x40 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0xa800 >>>> em1: [GIANT-LOCKED] >>>> em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:80:9f:b7 >>>> >>>> >>>> The chips are these >>>> em0@pci1:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10758086 chip=0x10758086 >>>> rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 >>>> em1@pci3:10:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10768086 chip=0x10768086 >>>> rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Are either of the IRQs (10 and 19) shared with other devices? >> >> >> >> Yes, the working one is shared with an (unused) USB port >> > > > . > -- -Søren