From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 14 07:11:59 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DF516A4CF
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:11:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9498B43D39
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:11:56 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9E7Bnga092570
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:11:49 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:11:49 +0300 (EEST)
From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20041014100207.H79329@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:10:41 +0000
Subject: Re: NOTICE: /dev/cuaa%d -> /dev/cuad%d renaming
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:12:00 -0000


Hello!

> Date:      Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:29:15 -0700
> From:      Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
>
> > Tie DCD to DTR. (I think)

  Exactly. Semi-standard rule for null-modem wiring should apply: RTS+CTS,
DTR+DSR+DCD.

>
>i was not clear.  this affects production racks in strange
>bunker-like facilities.
>
>and there is no access to wiring in the middle.  the cisco

  Than maybe you should try to use the following gettytab(5) facility:

      nc      bool    false             terminal does not supply carrier (set
                                        clocal)



Sincerely, Dmitry
-- 
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail:  dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE