From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 23:45:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31C416A4CF; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:45:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9154143D54; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j37NjKLa030287; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:45:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j37NjKkU030286; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:45:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:45:20 -0400 From: David Schultz To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050407234520.GA30206@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Poul-Henning Kamp , Scott Long , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20050407222505.GA29827@VARK.MIT.EDU> <21537.1112914979@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21537.1112914979@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Scott Long cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 geom.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:45:41 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >For the author of GEOM, the breakage should be easy to fix. Why > >not just fix it in the same way that you fixed fdisk over two > >years ago? > > Because I am approaching one commit every 8 hours of the last > calendar year, and I have quite frankly enough to do as it is. > > Sysinstall, fdisk, bsdlabel and boot0cfg are all userland programs > which should be well inside the envelope of pretty much anybody [...] Great, so we're both trying to get each other to do it. Of course, I don't have loads of free time either or I would have slept more than 3 hours last night. Sigh. > I'm sure that if it is important some developers will jump in and > make it better. This sort of attitude is related to a complaint of a number of ports developers and others, namely, that some people refuse to fix the things that they break.