From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Fri Oct 14 12:01:45 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EFBC10344
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A03DC83F
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:01:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9EC1hje043268
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:01:44 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 212283] oversized IP datagrams on raw socket with IP_RAWOUTPUT
 hang network interface drivers
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:01:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-212283-2472-7vflH3K4Oj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-212283-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-212283-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:01:45 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212283

Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tuexen@freebsd.org

--- Comment #17 from Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Gleb Smirnoff from comment #12)
Normally the kernel does fragmentation for raw IP packets. So I would prefe=
r to
keep that. But can't we check that the length provided in the send call mat=
ches
the length in the IP header. If there is a mismatch, return an error to the
user (indicating EINVAL)? That way the user gets an indication that some
information was inconsistent.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=