From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 23:36:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4A8106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:36:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FEA8FC13; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nibbler-wlan.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1RNZx1t095485; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:36:00 GMT (envelope-from flo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4F4C135E.6020601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:35:58 +0100 From: Florian Smeets User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <201202261434.q1QEYMbN006147@narawntapu.narawntapu> <4F4C0164.9090005@FreeBSD.org> <4F4C0942.2000002@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C0942.2000002@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE6B12D2EA65E9950563E6745" Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ca_root_nss fails to install if /etc/ssl/cert.pem alredy exists X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:36:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE6B12D2EA65E9950563E6745 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27.02.12 23:52, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 27.02.2012 17:19, Florian Smeets wrote: >> maybe I'm missing something but this should not happen because of >> >> %%ETCSYMLINK%%@cwd / >> %%ETCSYMLINK%%etc/ssl/cert.pem > Not sure... I had the update fail for me because the link was still the= re...=20 > Maybe, it is because I did not have the ETCSYMLINK option on, when I in= stalled=20 > the earlier version of the package -- and created the symlink manually = afterwards. >=20 > Whatever the reason the entry exists at install time, the port should n= ot be=20 > failing to register itself (after the complete installation) because of= it. >> On deinstall the symlink should be removed. And that seems to work her= e. >> >> Also if we consider the patch shouldn't it be || instead of&& ? > Oh, yes, of course. Thanks! Yours, >=20 Committed. Thanks. Florian --------------enigE6B12D2EA65E9950563E6745 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAk9ME18ACgkQapo8P8lCvwkgxACfeBiJezikj9CKgNEN6ljokbOc 9EUAn1jh26SXziKRz50gTgkUhhnwVCJC =nore -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE6B12D2EA65E9950563E6745--