From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 04:29:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFB516A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 04:29:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F388643D39 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 04:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 86396 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2005 20:29:48 -0800 Received: from laptop.taborandtashell.net (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by outside.taborandtashell.net with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 20:29:48 -0800 Message-ID: <420991C1.2030808@taborandtashell.net> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: <1107920345.41909.2.camel@codegurus.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Mick Walker cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: GTK vs QT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:29:57 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker wrote: > >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back >>it up? > > > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :) > > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so. I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net