From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr 18 10:52:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA24976
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA24967
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 10:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with SMTP id SAA00937
	  ; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 18:52:15 +0100 (BST)
To: Matt Bartley <mbartley@lear35.cytex.com>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: netinet/in_proto.c warnings 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Apr 1996 20:27:05 PDT."
             <199604180327.UAA02026@lear35.cytex.com> 
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 18:52:15 +0100
Message-ID: <935.829849935@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Matt Bartley wrote in message ID
<199604180327.UAA02026@lear35.cytex.com>:
> It then goes on to compile the kernel with no apparent harm done.
> Should I go back to ignoring it?  I couldn't find any mention of this
> in the list archive.

Ignore it. I'm probably going to try cleaning this up soon. Garrett
will probably kill me in the process :-)

Gary