From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 20 23:44:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB50637B416; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0107.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.107] helo=mindspring.com) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16SZ76-0004q7-00; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:43:32 -0800 Message-ID: <3C4BC6A0.4078CBA6@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:43:28 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Murray Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" , des@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review References: <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> <200201202344.g0KNijt34738@grimreaper.grondar.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Murray wrote: > > Yes. And to allow PAM stack to make right decision, pam_opie pass special > > information to PAM stack. Look at the patch, pam_opie not breaks from the > > stack by yourself, it is /etc/pam* do that using information from > > pam_opie. > > Sure - but you are making specialised use of the return value that > assumes that pam_opie will be followed by pam_unix. This violates > the PAM spec. Cool discussion. Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to integrate PAM and Kerberos? 8-) 8-) 8-). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message