From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Nov 21 8:25:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from smtp05.primenet.com (smtp05.primenet.com [64.211.219.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E5D37B43E for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 08:25:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp05.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA29794 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:25:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr01.primenet.com(206.165.6.201) via SMTP by smtp05.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAXraif6; Wed Nov 21 09:24:57 2001 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:31:06 -0700 (MST) From: Rudolfo Munguia To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: 4.4 pccard insanity Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Just to blatantly display my ignorance, and hopefully in the process reach some level of enlightenment; I present the following observations: A) In looking through /etc/ I happened upon rc.pccard, upon inspecting this it appears that pccardc is used to set mem/beep/conf before pccardd is called. B) I find on many posts to the group that pccardc is unable to operate unless pccardd is started first. Which is the proper case? If A then pccardc should be able to pull a dumpcis regardless of the pccardd state. (not the observed behavior) If B then could rc.pccard be the point of failure? rudog@primenet.com 'If you're not living on the edge, then you're taking up too much space' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message