From owner-freebsd-security Sat Jul 5 14:34:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA20865 for security-outgoing; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 14:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monoid.cs.tcd.ie (ts07-10.dublin.indigo.ie [194.125.148.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA20859 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 14:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by monoid.cs.tcd.ie (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA24165; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 22:33:36 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199707052133.WAA24165@monoid.cs.tcd.ie> X-Authentication-Warning: monoid.cs.tcd.ie: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Adam Shostack cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Security Model/Target for FreeBSD or 4.4? X-Address: Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland. X-Phone: (Home)+353-(0)1-6765859 (College)+353-(0)1-7021321 X-PGP: Public Key on Request In-reply-to: Message from Adam Shostack dated today at 11:17. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24160.868138413.1@monoid> Content-Description: text Date: Sat, 05 Jul 1997 22:33:34 +0100 From: Colman Reilly Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Colman Reilly wrote: | Does anyone have suggestions where I might find a statement of the secur ity | target or security model for FreeBSD or (since I assume the model is muc h | the same) 4.4BSD? Design and Operation of the 4.4BSD Operating System, by McKusick, Bostick, Karels, and Quarterman? 0-201-54979-4. I'm afraid not: the index mentions security twice. I can't find a general discussion of security issues from a design point of view: it's done on a per-bit-of-implementation basis. I also spent a couple of hours fighting with Alta Vista looking for relevant documents and didn't find very much. Any other suggestions? Colman