From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 05:00:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CC416A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6809A43D39 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:00:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8B73D28; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:00:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: Matthew Seaman Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:00:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <40161A87.13165.5323523@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20040127094604.GA13559@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <40158A17.2878.2FDF2E3@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another milestone... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:00:09 -0000 On 27 Jan 2004 at 9:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2003 at 22:34, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > > According to freshports.org, the addition of the palm/uppc-kmod port on > > > Mon Dec 29 16:33:02 2003 UTC has resulted in the passing of yet another > > > milestone: this took the count of available ports to 10,000. > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/palm/uppc-kmod/Makefile > > > > > > Pretty impressive going. > > > > Not to detract from the significance, But I should be the first to > > say that FreshPorts counts ports differently to that found in > > /usr/ports/INDEX, which does not necessarily include all ports in the > > tree. > > Hmmm... yes, at the time there was a difference of about 10 between > between the FreshPorts count and INDEX on my machine. > > At least, I think that's what I counted a month ago when I sent that. > Must have gone by a RFC2549 link... There are many messages slowly tricking through like that. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/