From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 14:19:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3896D16A4CF; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D8E43D45; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:19:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (scottl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8OEJKCp045472; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:19:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (scottl@localhost)i8OEJKUV045469; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:19:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pooker.samsco.org: scottl owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:19:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Long Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.org To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman In-Reply-To: <20040924140756.GG959@green.homeunix.org> Message-ID: <20040924081830.K39925@pooker.samsco.org> References: <200409221253.i8MCrR4K036310@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040924140756.GG959@green.homeunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Oliver Lehmann Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:19:08 -0000 On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Brian Feldman wrote: > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.209 +1 -0 src/sys/net/if.c > > > > Are there plans for MFCing 208 and 209? > > There are supposed to be, because it's listed as one of the 5.3-RELEASE > blockers. However, I don't think the 5.3-RELEASE blockers are actually > going to block anything. > Why do you say that? Are you going to MFC these other versions, or just wait and then complain that we released known bad code? Scott