From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 16 13:42:37 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA18104 for current-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 13:42:37 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA18088 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 13:42:14 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA24921; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 22:41:59 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA15202; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 22:41:58 +0200 Message-Id: <199506162041.WAA15202@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray), FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: DES, crypt and eBones Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 22:41:57 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.Org Precedence: bulk > > No, listen. The code is already outside the US. Now that it is out, I can > > re-import it with impunity. :-> :-> :-> > > Perhaps with impunity from ZA but not with impunity from the USA, they > could still take legal action (the State Department is very weird this > way). Maybe I just don't understand the issue here; I thought that once the code is outside the US and "your" (as opposed to "my") nose is clean, we can mess with Kerberos (or DES or anything else) as long as the code movement is _into_ the US. I would continue to maintain my mirror with the same code for the non-US netizens. Can this work or is it still dangerous? > > What you do with the attic is Your Problem (tm). > > It is *our* problem, if your not going to play team like this is > never going to work... Sorry - I left out the smiley. I intend to play team. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200