From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 07:12:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E6FB2CCA5 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 07:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S32.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s32.hotmail.com [65.55.111.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D601748 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 07:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP136 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S32.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 4 May 2016 00:11:20 -0700 X-TMN: [cmN0LoUVAOZgYEpDn0JmD30lz8DnvA/u] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Warren Block References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> CC: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 12:41:06 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2016 07:11:17.0756 (UTC) FILETIME=[271173C0:01D1A5D4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 07:12:29 -0000 On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > >> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks >> >> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 > > Looks like this one: > http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 > > Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory > would be in one of the removable DIMMs. > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick up any errors in 65 passes ? Regards Manish Jain