From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri May 16 05:43:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA26073
          for isp-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 05:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA26063
          for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 16 May 1997 05:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (shovey@buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA21394; Fri, 16 May 1997 08:42:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 08:42:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steve <shovey@buffnet.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Yura Socolov <yura@binary.net>, Damian Hamill <damian@cablenet.net>,
        freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: radius, usr total control and freebsd 
In-Reply-To: <17726.863783359@time.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970516084241.9445Q-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Ultimately, of course, there will be solutions which are compatible
> with both, but do you really want to make the investment now?
> 

I have 12 competitors in the area who are.