From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 27 16:53:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1D5E0B;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay02.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::104])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mailhost.stack.nl",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80B7243D;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:53:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id B4A75359319; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mailscan02.stack.nl
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Relay-Country: NL
X-Spam-DCC: Etherboy: mailscan02.stack.nl 1002; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Received: from mud.stack.nl (mud.stack.nl [131.155.141.70])
 by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEC3359308;
 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:53:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mud.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 801)
 id 5C5623C6033; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:53:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:53:38 +0200
From: Johan van Selst <johans@stack.nl>
To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" <pvoigt@uos.de>
Subject: Re: gpg --refresh-keys fails with "rejected by import filter"
Message-ID: <20140627165338.GA65612@mud.stack.nl>
References: <20140627141439.26f6edd7@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140627141439.26f6edd7@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: kuriyama@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:53:48 -0000


--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Peter,

Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> So I played a bit and found that specifying more than one key fails,
[..]
> Is this related to GnuPG 2.0.24 or to the FreeBSD port? I can compare
> just with a GnuPG 2.0.23 under Linux. This version works as expected.

This is a confirmed bug in the GnuPG 2.0.24 release. There will
probably be a bugfix-release soon. A patch candidate can be found at
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2014-June/028522.html


Regards,
Johan

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF4EAREIAAYFAlOtoZEACgkQAEpMHW8nCPT0VQD/XphRBLXuwyC9n+o150BpjeJl
aj/9fWzcUZUI83C4J/4A/Rt6z3tq8XW5nQxqPYK7oGwvCAualTlVShKfUQpI2JAL
=q3AE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr--